Friz-Rocker wrote:If someone has an e-bay account, just log on there and submit a question in the form of a statement that these may be stolen.It will then be on her site.
Are they actually stolen since the go dig them out of the ponds/river.
Friz-Rocker wrote:If someone has an e-bay account, just log on there and submit a question in the form of a statement that these may be stolen.It will then be on her site.
Ring wrote:2 OF THOSE DISCS ARE MINE!! tHE DRAGON 1 TOO!!! wHAT A LITTLE TROLL.. i JUST LOST THAT ADVANCED TROPHY DISC A WEEK AGO
iqbal wrote:She has 2 other auctions that are ending today, I plan on winning those too.
What someone might want to explain to her is that if a disc she finds in a pond, has a name and phone# on it, that said person wrote that on there in hopes that if the disc was ever lost, someone would contact them so they could get it back. That person has more attachment to that disc than some random bidder on eBay, and may very well pay better money for its return.jtkustomizer wrote: Whether we get out stuff back or not hopefully she is starting to understand how the disc golf etiquite works. maybe this will teach everybody a lesson and everything will start to work out for everybody.
I've actually been looking into this, and while a lot of us off the top of our heads would probably say that they're not stolen, the law really is not so clear. Here's a wikipedia article for instance:jtkustomizer wrote:Are they actually stolen since the go dig them out of the ponds/river.
Here is what that law statesscarpfish wrote:What someone might want to explain to her is that if a disc she finds in a pond, has a name and phone# on it, that said person wrote that on there in hopes that if the disc was ever lost, someone would contact them so they could get it back. That person has more attachment to that disc than some random bidder on eBay, and may very well pay better money for its return.jtkustomizer wrote: Whether we get out stuff back or not hopefully she is starting to understand how the disc golf etiquite works. maybe this will teach everybody a lesson and everything will start to work out for everybody.
I've actually been looking into this, and while a lot of us off the top of our heads would probably say that they're not stolen, the law really is not so clear. Here's a wikipedia article for instance:jtkustomizer wrote:Are they actually stolen since the go dig them out of the ponds/river.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost,_misl ... d_property
Lost property - Property is generally deemed to have been lost if it is found in a place where the true owner likely did not intend to set it down, and where it is not likely to be found by the true owner. At common law, the finder of a lost item could claim the right to possess the item against any other person in the world except the true owner.
The underlying policy goals to these distinctions are to (hopefully) see that the property is returned to its true original owner, or "title owner." Most jurisdictions have now enacted statutes requiring that the finder of lost property must turn it in to the proper authorities; if the true owner does not arrive to claim the property within a certain period of time, the property is returned to the finder as his own, or is disposed of.
Mislaid property - Property is generally deemed to have been mislaid (some courts refer to it as misplaced) if it is found in a place where the true owner likely did intend to set it, but then simply forgot to pick it up again. For example, a wallet found in a shop lying on a counter near a cash register will likely be deemed misplaced rather than lost. Under common law principles, the finder of a misplaced object has a duty to turn it over to the owner of the premises, on the theory that the true owner is likely to return to that location to search for his misplaced item.
Abandoned property - Property is generally deemed to have been abandoned if it is found in a place where the true owner likely intended to leave it, but is in such a condition that it is apparent that the true owner has no intention of returning to claim the item.
And with specific respect to Kansas:
http://kansasstatutes.lesterama.org/Cha ... -3703.html
So is a disc lying at the bottom of a pond or stream lost, mislaid or abandoned? Does the length of time its been in there have any bearing on that? Does putting your name and Phone# on it? I'm no lawyer, but it would be interesting to see how something like this would play out in court.