Due to inactivity the KDGA forums have been locked. All past threads are still available. Please join us on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/groups/kansasdiscgolf!

Peter Pan Park

Emporia news and happenings
User avatar
McCabe
Regional Rep
Posts: 2857
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 2:22 pm
Location: Discraft Country
Contact:

Post by McCabe »

J wrote:Do you think the course will be ready to go friday?
Doubt it. It was going to go in on Wed. but with the rain coming...prolly won't happen till early next week.
User avatar
Ruder
Posts: 1584
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 4:38 pm
Contact:

Post by Ruder »

Rain? What is this RAIN you speak of?
J
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 1:02 pm
Location: Terre Haute, IN

Post by J »

Ruder wrote:Rain? What is this RAIN you speak of?
:lol:
User avatar
McCabe
Regional Rep
Posts: 2857
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 2:22 pm
Location: Discraft Country
Contact:

Post by McCabe »

The "new" course should be ready to play by sometime early next week..
J
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 1:02 pm
Location: Terre Haute, IN

Post by J »

McCabe wrote:The "new" course should be ready to play by sometime early next week..
sounds good.
nastyNate
Posts: 1104
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:58 pm
Location: Salina

Post by nastyNate »

city pulled some of the pins today before being interupted by the rain.....hopefully it is dry over the weekend and they can finish up Mon or Tues.
#23996
User avatar
McCabe
Regional Rep
Posts: 2857
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 2:22 pm
Location: Discraft Country
Contact:

Post by McCabe »

The "new" Peter will be playable tomorrow!
J
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 1:02 pm
Location: Terre Haute, IN

Post by J »

McCabe wrote:The "new" Peter will be playable tomorrow!
My girlfriend wanted to go to the park, so we went out and I played the "new" layout.... minus pins, yesterday.

All in all, I wasn't horribly thrilled. I liked a couple of the new holes, but overall, i think the course lost some of its charecter. Like 8 and 9 seem kinda silly now, where as before, if you didn't play them right, you were guaranteed to struggle. I understand from a layout/flow perspective why they were moved... It just doesn't seem like as much fun...especially from a charecter (IE: originality/natural obstacles) standpoint.

I was extremely dissapointed by the dividing of 13 into 13 & 14. That was a great long hole, that's now 2 easy short holes. If anything, Id have left the old 13, 14 and 15, as I think in the end, they were at least a bit more challenging than the new layout. The new 15 is long but I made it there in 2, putt for 3, and Im not that long of a driver. Id say the old 13 was a more difficult long hole.

A lot of the course felt like playing the jones east course (12,13,14,15), which I guess is cool for those people who like to drive in the open all the time (and watch their disc soar), but it tends to bore those of us who like a little punishment from obstacles. :wink: All this being said, Hole 7 definatly added a stroke. That was almost always a birdie shot before. I dont think it offsets the easiness of the new 13 and 14, but it was definatly a more difficult hole.

anyways, just thought Id post a few early impressions. Hope to play it a few times this next week or two... see if some new impressions develop.

PS: Hole 16 makes Rice Park look difficult :( Rice Park is the only place I'd driven with a Rhyno before yesterday.

PPS: Hole 12 is ridiculously dangerous. It's shooting right next to a picnic area. Is the city going to move that picnic area, so no one gets hit while eating, or are golfers just responsible for not throwing towards a picnic area?
User avatar
McCabe
Regional Rep
Posts: 2857
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 2:22 pm
Location: Discraft Country
Contact:

Post by McCabe »

First off, Hole 8, and 9 on the "old" layout were the worst holes EVER! No true shot to the hole! Much better holes now, 8 is bad ass with the basket hidden behind the two trees!

Second, Hole 13, and 14 were supposed to be a little different than they are now, but the City had a problem with our original layout, so we moved it the best we could.

Third, You would have left holes 14, 15 the same??? Are you kidding me? Those were worthless!

Forth,
"A lot like playing Jones East"
What? Not even close to the same, there are still technical shots all over the Peter!

Fifth,
"Hole 16 makes Rice Park look difficult Rice Park is the only place I'd driven with a Rhyno before yesterday."
Now I know your crazy! Hole 16 is a sweet little turnover putter shot, that will be heavily guarded in the spring and summer time!

Sixth,
"Hole 12 is ridiculously dangerous. It's shooting right next to a picnic area. Is the city going to move that picnic area, so no one gets hit while eating, or are golfers just responsible for not throwing towards a picnic area?"
--Put the crack pipe down! Hole 12 used to throw right over the top of the picnic table, now its not even close to it!
smitty
Posts: 8009
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 6:19 pm
Location: Walnut Valley

Post by smitty »

I know your frustrations Eric. Everyone has an opinion and everyone could have done better.

From me to you, don't let it get you razzled. Most of the people who complain have not done anything to help out.
nastyNate
Posts: 1104
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:58 pm
Location: Salina

Post by nastyNate »

my thoughts on the course go like this:

the originals on 1-4 were all easy birdies....we made one a more technical shot by moving the tee to block the hyzer. two will probably average at least a full stroke tougher than the original. three is going to play about the same by score but i love the new look to the hole. 4 will add at least 1.5 and maybe even two strokes to the scoring average, that hole is bad a$$! 450-500 dogleg right the whole way! 5 and 6 will both be birds in their new layout but both have danger that could easily translate into bogeys. plus that section of the course will flow MUCH better. 7 we only moved the tee pad 30 feet. we might play an alternate pin in the tourney on that hole! hole 8 and 9 original were both poor tee locations. both have been moved to more open and safer areas(no tree roots). 8 will also have an alt. pin for the tourney(it is the Monkey Island Open after all!) i don't think that either is an open hole; there is plenty of tree hazard on both fairways. 10-11 will stay the same. Our design for 12-14 was better than what we ended up with, but the city thought it would be better to entirely avoid that picnic table. 12 will be a tough birdie as it is on the edge of a mid, but a driver could find its way to the pond. 13 i have not thrown but would assume that a decent range hyzer should get the job done. 14 is not what we wanted and hope that we can get it modified. we have two alternate locations for the pin on that hole that will both make the hole more difficult. 15 is a great hole. only the bombers can hope to drive the green while an errant drive could take them into the trees. Everyone else will be forced to use an approach; i believe this is the definition of par 4 golf. 16 is a beautiful hole. can't see the basket from the tee; sloping green; dogleg right. sounds good to me. and 17-18 will be the same. in all i am going to guess that my scoring average on the new course should go up at least three strokes. along with the smoother flow, i think the design is much improved.
#23996
Sandman
Posts: 1545
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: iCT
Contact:

Post by Sandman »

So what up with these monkeys???
superq
Posts: 999
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:51 pm
Location: in the yard putting

Post by superq »

sounds like sprout engorged the peter...
DJayhawk
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 1:45 pm
Location: Kansas City
Contact:

Post by DJayhawk »

McCabe wrote:The "new" Peter will be playable tomorrow!
That was posted Tuesday, can you tell me if they finished today? Me and a buddy are heading down from KC tomorrow to play Peter Pan, and one of the Jones Park courses which leads me to my next question. If we only have time to play one Jones Park which one is the must play?

TIA

-Dennis
SWee-tee
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 12:14 am
Location: Topeka

Post by SWee-tee »

I would have to say the East course is the more challenging of the two Jones Park courses. The West is a good course, but the holes aren't as long as those on the East. The choice is yours as to which is the must play i guess....... :)
I'm missing Emporia :( ........never thought I would say that......
Post Reply